
The college football regular season is complete. Conference champions have been crowned. The bowl games begin on Saturday, December 13 with the Celebration Bowl (also, Army-Navy is that afternoon!). And, the first round of the playoffs begin on December 19.
The College Football Playoff (CFP) committee announced its final group of 12 who will compete for this year’s national championship. Given the outcomes of the conference championships, there weren’t very many surprises. Indiana moved to the #1 seed after beating Ohio State to become Big Ten champs. Bama’s in, Georgia’s in – with a possibility of giving them a third contest this season in the National Championship game. Everyone’s date with destiny is set.
I was excited for an expanded playoff. Four teams just never felt like enough. So, when we moved to twelve, it just felt right…almost. Before I proceed, let’s be clear on two things:
- The CFP selection committee has a difficult job.
- Unless we’re going to design a 136-team bracket and play football through March (wait a second…), someone will always be “left out,” and people will debate it until next year’s CFP.
That being said. We’re not quite there. Giving the five highest ranked conference champions an automatic bid is eliminating teams who have earned (not deserve…EARNED) an opportunity to compete for a natty.
For example, let’s talk about Notre Dame (10-2) who finished the regular season 11th in the CFP rankings and played in the National Championship last year. They were the “first team out” this year in favor of American Conference Champion, Tulane (11-2, 20th), and Sun Belt Conference Champion, James Madison (12-1, 24th). Say what you like about winning a conference championship – the competition in those conferences doesn’t match up with the opponents the Irish faced in 2025 as an independent. Notre Dame finished the season with 24th most challenging schedule of 2024. Tulane: 72nd, JMU: 118th. Acknowledging that the schedule is set months (sometimes more) in advance, the reality is Notre Dame had a tougher road to their 10-2 record.
Another argument I’ve heard in the last 2 years is “the smaller conferences need to have a better shot at getting in.” My only response to that would be “why?” The previous argument about strength of schedule differences aside, let’s talk about how the lines of conferences continue to get blurred. For example, 18 schools play football in the Big…10? The Big 12 has 16. I’m no mathematician, but a certain Princess Bride quote comes to mind (“You keep using that word…”). The SEC has grown 33% since 2020 and now includes areas I wouldn’t consider southeast, geographically speaking. I’m not certain the conference structure means as much as it used to unless you are a college football purist. Schools are chasing the TV contract money, and I don’t fault them for that. But with the constant shifting, I’m not sure there’s a conference argument to be made, especially when the schools in the smaller conferences aspire to move up.
At work, when I bring a problem to the table, I try to bring a solution as well. So, who do I think should make the CFP? I vote that we use the results of the AFCA Coaches Poll with seeding determined by the ranking in this poll. No automatic bids for a conference championship – pure positioning the poll. In my opinion, it’s the current coaches who know these teams better than any athletic director, analyst, or former player. And if we want to give the Tulanes and James Madisons of the world a title shot, expand the field. After all, I don’t think any of us would complain about more football….




